CROWN Act Coverage Depends on Where You Work, Live, and Study
Whether a hair-based dress code is unlawful where you live and what the law names.
A reading desk built on a working Buffalo beauty catalogue: what the products are, what they cost, and where they are stocked.
Read any care label, including an imported one, and know what the maker had to prove before printing it.
192 catalogue entries sit in this section.
Written for this desk.
About 5 minutes.
The tag inside your collar is not a suggestion. Under Federal Trade Commission rules, every textile garment sold in the United States must carry a permanent care label that stays legible through ordinary use, and every instruction printed on it—every word, every symbol—must rest on evidence the manufacturer gathered before the first unit shipped.
The FTC's Care Labeling Rule, first issued in 1971 and amended most substantively in 1998, applies to all textile wearing apparel and certain piece goods. Manufacturers and importers must attach labels that state what regular care is needed for ordinary use. A 1994 Federal Register notice makes clear that selling without such a label constitutes an unfair or deceptive act. The label itself must be "a permanent label or tag" attached or affixed so it "will not become separated from the product and will remain legible during the useful life of the product," according to the rule text.
The burden runs deeper than mere presence. The FTC requires a "reasonable basis" for every instruction and warning. A 1998 amendment defined this as "reliable evidence supporting the instructions," with acceptable sources including successful testing, documented harm from warned-against methods, current technical literature, past experience, or industry expertise. The maker cannot guess. The maker must already know.
The rule distinguishes sharply between "Dryclean" and "Dryclean Only." The FTC's business guidance states that a label cannot say "Dryclean Only" unless there is proof that washing will harm the garment. This is not a marketing emphasis. It is a factual threshold. If washing works, the label must not forbid it.
The same logic governs drycleaning itself. If any part of the standard drycleaning process—solvent, temperature, mechanical action—would damage the item, the instruction must include a warning to avoid or modify that step. The label cannot simply punt with a generic "Dryclean." It must be specific about constraints.
The rule also handles the edge case: a garment that cannot survive any available cleaning method. In that circumstance, the label must say so explicitly. Silence is not an option. Nor can the maker leave the consumer to discover ruin through trial and error.
The FTC permits symbols drawn from ASTM Standard D5489-96c in place of words, provided they fulfill the rule's requirements. SGS, in a 2018 summary, outlined the minimum laundering sequence these symbols must cover: washing, bleaching, drying, and ironing, with a separate symbol for dry cleaning or professional textile care.
The five families, as derived from ASTM D5489-96c, organize care instructions by process:
Washing appears as a tub with water level and motion indicators. Dots indicate maximum temperature: one for cold, two for warm, three for hot. Bars beneath the tub signal agitation limits—no bar for normal, one for permanent press, two for delicate.
Bleaching uses a triangle. Variations mark whether any bleach, only non-chlorine bleach, or no bleach at all is safe.
Drying shows as a square with a circle inside. Dots again indicate heat level. Lines inside the square distinguish tumble dry from line dry, drip dry, or flat dry.
Ironing takes the shape of an iron. Dots specify soleplate temperature: one for low, two for medium, three for high. A crossed-out iron means do not press.
Dry cleaning uses a circle. Letters inside—P, F, or W—identify which solvents may be used. Bars beneath the circle mirror the washing convention: none for normal, one for reduced, two for no mechanical action. A crossed-out circle prohibits dry cleaning entirely.
These symbols allow imported garments to communicate across language barriers, though the FTC rule itself references ASTM rather than ISO standards.
The FTC has acknowledged the reality of international commerce. A 2014 roundtable transcript shows the Commission proposed allowing both ASTM and ISO care systems, noting that extra information is permitted but not required. This matters for consumers reading tags on imported goods. An ISO-formatted label on a European garment sold in the United States may carry symbols shaped slightly differently, organized under different standard numbers, yet still comply if the underlying information is accurate.
The practical consequence: do not assume foreign labels follow U.S. Conventions exactly. The tub, triangle, square, iron, and circle families remain recognizable, but subtle differences in dot placement or line weight may reflect ISO derivation rather than ASTM. The FTC's flexibility on symbol systems does not extend to the underlying obligation—the maker must still have tested the garment, must still ensure the label stays attached, must still warn against harmful processes.
The rule's permanence requirement exists because a detached or faded label leaves the consumer without required information. The FTC's definition of a care label—permanent, attached, legible through the product's useful life—implies a remedy when this fails. A garment sold without a visible, attached label violates the rule from the moment of sale. A label that detaches in the first wash represents the same failure, even if the physical tag survives somewhere in the laundry basket.
The consumer facing this gap faces risk. Without the manufacturer's tested guidance, any cleaning method becomes a gamble. The FTC does not prescribe specific penalties for missing labels in its public guidance, but the underlying rule treats non-compliance as an unfair practice, potentially triggering enforcement action against the seller or manufacturer.
The care label is a regulatory output, not a courtesy. Before those symbols were printed, someone had to wash-test the fabric, dryclean-test the construction, document the results, and confirm that the recommended method would not cause "substantial damage"—the FTC's threshold—during ordinary use. When the tag says "Dryclean Only," it claims, under penalty of federal law, that water and agitation would destroy what solvent and mechanical restraint preserve.
That gap between claim and proof is what the rule polices. The consumer who understands this can read a label with appropriate skepticism: not because the instructions are wrong, but because they are compulsory, evidence-based, and legally binding on the party that attached them.
Median here is $29.99 against $24.99 across the whole catalogue. 4 entries in the section carry no recorded price and are left out. 1 entry is listed at $0: counted in the first band, not named above.
Whether a hair-based dress code is unlawful where you live and what the law names.
Turn a fiber percentage into an expectation about how a piece will wear.
Which property you are actually buying and what the cheaper fiber does and does not cost them.
Take your own measurements and order from a chart instead of guessing a letter.
What the figures come from. Every product name, price, stock state and photograph on this site is taken from the brand’s own product records. Where a record is silent, the field is left off the page rather than filled in.
What the articles rest on. Each piece names the statute, the agency rule or the labeling standard it describes, and stays inside it. Figures, dates and thresholds are the ones in those documents.
What is not done here. Nothing in this catalogue is bought, sampled or tested by the desk. No product is scored or ranked against another, no placement is sold inside an article, and nothing on these pages is medical advice.
This page: August 19, 2026
This site keeps only what it needs to remember this choice and to serve pages. No advertising or profiling cookies are set. See the cookie note and the privacy policy.